
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Origin of Circuits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits</link>
	<description>A collection of Damn Interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:31:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghstman</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-25366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghstman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-25366</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a neural net processor, a learning computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a neural net processor, a learning computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-25146</link>
		<dc:creator>WordSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-25146</guid>
		<description>Late poster ... Anyways :

This reminds me of an article I had read a few years ago of analog circuit robots (insect-size) that evolve behavioral traits that were not designed ... one that especially impressed me was about a group of these robots that were dependent on sunlight for powering themselves. The amazing thing was, one of the robots started pushing the smaller ones out of it&#039;s way, in a circle around it, creating a territory where it dominated. DI indeed ... and a bit wierd at the same time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late poster &#8230; Anyways :</p>
<p>This reminds me of an article I had read a few years ago of analog circuit robots (insect-size) that evolve behavioral traits that were not designed &#8230; one that especially impressed me was about a group of these robots that were dependent on sunlight for powering themselves. The amazing thing was, one of the robots started pushing the smaller ones out of it&#8217;s way, in a circle around it, creating a territory where it dominated. DI indeed &#8230; and a bit wierd at the same time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirage_GSM</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-24615</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirage_GSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-24615</guid>
		<description>[quote]E-hero said: &quot;... I was wondering, how does the computer choose the optimal chip, I understand for something as simple as choosing between two sounds, but what happens when the goal for the chip isn&#039;t clear? As in, with the antenna example, it&#039;s obvious that the antenna design that picks up the best signal is the most efficient, but what if the attempt was to create something that gives off a result that can&#039;t be so easily measured?&quot;[/quote]
Defining the criteria for which to select is necessary for this method to work. If you cannot define the criteria, the circuits that are allowed to &quot;procreate&quot; would have to be chosen at random, and you would very probably not see any progress from generation to generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]E-hero said: &#8220;&#8230; I was wondering, how does the computer choose the optimal chip, I understand for something as simple as choosing between two sounds, but what happens when the goal for the chip isn&#8217;t clear? As in, with the antenna example, it&#8217;s obvious that the antenna design that picks up the best signal is the most efficient, but what if the attempt was to create something that gives off a result that can&#8217;t be so easily measured?&#8221;[/quote]<br />
Defining the criteria for which to select is necessary for this method to work. If you cannot define the criteria, the circuits that are allowed to &#8220;procreate&#8221; would have to be chosen at random, and you would very probably not see any progress from generation to generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShowerRockGod</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-23651</link>
		<dc:creator>ShowerRockGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-23651</guid>
		<description>One thing I think is being forgotten is that intelligence is far from being the only thing evolution selects for. Evolution simply selects the traits that provide for better survival. Therefore to get an intelligent robot with a genetic algorithm you would need some way to select for intelligent behavior. Try that for a mental excercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I think is being forgotten is that intelligence is far from being the only thing evolution selects for. Evolution simply selects the traits that provide for better survival. Therefore to get an intelligent robot with a genetic algorithm you would need some way to select for intelligent behavior. Try that for a mental excercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OmegaSeeker</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-23338</link>
		<dc:creator>OmegaSeeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-23338</guid>
		<description>Flash forward a few decades and highly evolved AIs will be arguing over how they came about; creation or evolution? :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash forward a few decades and highly evolved AIs will be arguing over how they came about; creation or evolution? :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watthEFUCNK</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-23323</link>
		<dc:creator>watthEFUCNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-23323</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Spam deleted&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spam deleted</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watthEFUCNK</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-23322</link>
		<dc:creator>watthEFUCNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-23322</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Spam deleted&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spam deleted</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watthEFUCNK</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits#comment-23321</link>
		<dc:creator>watthEFUCNK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=870#comment-23321</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Spam deleted&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spam deleted</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
