Printed from DamnInteresting.com

The (Almost) Impenetrable Defenses of France

Maginot Line bunkerAfter World War I, the French were understandably worried about another invasion. They had suffered many losses in the first world war and wanted to prevent future defeat from their rivals. The general consensus in France was to build a defensive wall – and thus the Maginot Line was built, named after French minister of defense AndrĂ© Maginot. It was a series of fortifications along the French borders with Germany and Italy; its chief design was in preventing future invasions.

The line itself was a pinnacle of modern defenses. Instead of a single wall, it was a series of over five hundred buildings – some key forts, others small bunkers, all designed to slow the advance of an enemy. The bunkers themselves were large – some over six stories deep – and had all living necessities, plus hospitals and trains to get from bunker to bunker. This is to say nothing of the impressive armaments put on the line. If the next great war were to become dependent on the trenches, as in World War I, then the French would be ready.

Yet on May 10, 1940, Germany invaded France. Within two months France surrendered. What had gone wrong?

France’s first mistake was depending too much on the Maginot Line without mobile forces. There were two main thoughts on the future defense of France: many had learned their lesson from the first war, with its endless trench battles. If France were to fall in another trench war, they would be much better defended with stronger fortifications on their side. However, a few men, such as Charles de Gaulle, argued that more mobile units were needed, such as tanks and aircraft. Their protests went unheeded. This lack of a strong mobile force caused France to become stymied in the face of a German blitzkrieg.

The second, and much more damaging problem, was France’s disregard of defense around the Ardennes Forest and Belgium. It was believed by the French that tanks could not navigate the forest, so it was left out of the Maginot Line. Belgium and France were in an alliance at the time of the Maginot Line’s conception, so it was left largely undefended as well. Unfortunately for France, German forces cut through the country from Belgium, the Netherlands, and most damningly the Ardennes Forest. Germany managed to get to the core of France without ever having to deal with the Maginot Line.

Many cite the Maginot Line as the ultimate act of hubris – that simply building a wall is not enough to defend oneself against an obvious threat such as Germany. However, in its defense, it did serve its main purpose – to slow down the attacking force. It successfully repelled the Italians until Germany came, and even then the Maginot Line never actually fell to Germany – it was simply bypassed, and eventually had to surrender with the rest of France.

Discuss this Article
Print this Article
Share (Reddit, Digg, Email...)
Forthcoming
Forthcoming
#1 JustAnotherName 24 December 2005 at 05:34 am

Never knew about these. Now, if I ever get my dream vacation of 2 months touring Europe by Train, Air Balloon, Airplane, and Boat I would have this on my must see list.

LOL – I guess I will never see these.


#2 Will 25 December 2005 at 09:43 pm

They went around :-)


#3 papawswrench 27 December 2005 at 12:59 am

I remember that the Germans simply went around the Maginot line , but this info is an interesting view on the subject .


#4 alipardiwala 27 December 2005 at 07:37 am

6 storeys of bunker? Thats bloody deep. But didn’t the french suffer a lot of losses in the war? Where did they get so many resources to go and build these things then?


#5 duffbeer703 30 December 2005 at 10:16 am

The persistant knocking of the Maginot Line is tremendously unfair & misleading — in fact the Magniot Line held off thousands of Germans and served its purpose — to prevent the French (and British) forces from being flanked by invading Germans.

The loss of France was caused by the aging and weak-kneed political and military leadership. The Germans won early victories, but were hardly rolling over the allied forces… most of the remaining Nazi tanks were obsolete and many of their experienced commanders were killed.

The French army continued to fight bravely, and was sold out by their leaders.


#6 A-Train72 19 August 2006 at 01:36 pm

wow i think somebody must be from france…..


#7 campo 10 December 2006 at 02:45 am

I find this article HILARIOUS.. all the resources put into the Maginot line.. and the damn Germans simply went around.. Gets me every time.

It’s like some one was walking along a road, and encountered a puddle in their way. And they just simply walked around with out even hesitating.

Comedy.


#8 J.K. 27 April 2007 at 08:17 am

It’s not as funny as it is pathetic and sad. That guy up there maybe french, or just well informed…maybe both. He is right though as it really made put the hurt on Mussolini’s nitwits and did slow/hurt any German that came near it, but as said the fools in France neglected to make a complete wall and ‘comedically’ so did bypass it like the above said…going around a puddle. One hell of a puddle though when you think that the country surrendered out from under a nearly invincible puddle which is ultimately why it fell.


#9 MarshyMarsh 14 July 2007 at 09:17 am

alipardiwala said: “6 storeys of bunker? Thats bloody deep. But didn’t the french suffer a lot of losses in the war? Where did they get so many resources to go and build these things then?”

The Treaty of Versailles, world war one came to an end without any death on german soil (well little) the Germans surrendered due to food shortages. Yet the surrender came as a shock to German soldiers, as they were still fighting on french soil.

The french got huge compensation from Germany’s Industry, hence they came out of the war farly well.


#10 Rroom101 20 December 2007 at 12:03 pm

France had requested numerous time in the previous year for assitance from the British and the Americans to help defend the area around Ardennes. They were well aware of that avenue of attack. For the most part the requests were rejected. The defence of that region was done w/o major fortifications, and relied on a more mobile defence (Tanks fighing in open fields…etc). It was the dynamic non-fortified line that failed and was overrun, causing the fall of France.

The line performed as it was designed to do. The wall also forced German forces through very difficult terrain, slowed them down, and strained the German supply lines. I doubt France would have faired any better without the wall. German military doctrine (and technoloy) was a generation ahead of the rest of the world.


#11 Guido 01 February 2008 at 06:11 am

When Germany attacked France, they went through Belgium, circumventing the Maginot Line. But France had reason to expect that Germany could not invade Belgium that easily, because Belgium was well defended with its own version of the Maginot Line.
Germany’s attack on Belgium was not unexpected, as they already did this in WWI. That is why Belgium built a series of huge forts at its borders. Together with the easily defendable terrain with lots of rivers and canals, Belgium was thought to be save. The Germans’ mode of attack with hollow-charges and heavy gliders was unexpected and unprecedented. Read the history of Fort Eben-Emael to learn about that crazy story.
On the question of payment for all these bunkers: Having lost the war, Germany had to pay for them.


You must be logged in to post a comment.