
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Emotional Bankruptcy of Alexithymia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia</link>
	<description>A collection of Damn Interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:31:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howzat</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-24340</link>
		<dc:creator>Howzat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-24340</guid>
		<description>I notice a few of the above links are dead. So here are some live links: 
Online Alexithymia Questionnaire-G2:  http://oaq.blogspot.com/ 
Two-Factor Imagination Scale:  http://tfis.blogspot.com/ 
Alexithymia Exchange (chat forum):  http://groups.google.com/group/exchange-forum?hl=en

There&#039;s also a new book out about alexithymia called &#039;Emotionally Dumb: An Overview of Alexithymia&#039; which is reviewed and can be purchased here: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6392761-emotionally-dumb-an-overview-of-alexithymia  

Howzat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice a few of the above links are dead. So here are some live links:<br />
Online Alexithymia Questionnaire-G2:  <a href="http://oaq.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://oaq.blogspot.com/</a><br />
Two-Factor Imagination Scale:  <a href="http://tfis.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tfis.blogspot.com/</a><br />
Alexithymia Exchange (chat forum):  <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/exchange-forum?hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/exchange-forum?hl=en</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a new book out about alexithymia called &#8216;Emotionally Dumb: An Overview of Alexithymia&#8217; which is reviewed and can be purchased here: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6392761-emotionally-dumb-an-overview-of-alexithymia" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6392761-emotionally-dumb-an-overview-of-alexithymia</a>  </p>
<p>Howzat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a1c</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-22442</link>
		<dc:creator>a1c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-22442</guid>
		<description>Some antidepressants cause this.  Basically, it has the effect of inducing &quot;psychopathy&quot; in the literal sense, similar to Asperger&#039;s Syndrome.  Possibly an issue relating to mirror neurons or the limbic system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some antidepressants cause this.  Basically, it has the effect of inducing &#8220;psychopathy&#8221; in the literal sense, similar to Asperger&#8217;s Syndrome.  Possibly an issue relating to mirror neurons or the limbic system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wooden_Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-20222</link>
		<dc:creator>Wooden_Mockingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-20222</guid>
		<description>On an unrelated note:

Can you imagine roleplaying an Alexithymic...? The mind boggles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On an unrelated note:</p>
<p>Can you imagine roleplaying an Alexithymic&#8230;? The mind boggles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wooden_Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-20221</link>
		<dc:creator>Wooden_Mockingbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-20221</guid>
		<description>*is jealous*

I&#039;m whatever the opposite of Alexithymia is.

Such fun. [/sarcasm]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*is jealous*</p>
<p>I&#8217;m whatever the opposite of Alexithymia is.</p>
<p>Such fun. [/sarcasm]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-19344</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-19344</guid>
		<description>http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw" rel="nofollow">http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-19343</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-19343</guid>
		<description>For a lively discussion about alexithymia go to the following free discussion forum: 

THE ALEXITHYMIA EXCHANGE    at:  http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw

Both people with alexithymia, or if you know someone who has it, or for people who are researching or &#039;just curious&#039; about it,  all welcome to join in the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a lively discussion about alexithymia go to the following free discussion forum: </p>
<p>THE ALEXITHYMIA EXCHANGE    at:  <a href="http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw" rel="nofollow">http://groups.msn.com/ALEXITHYMIAEXCHANGE/_whatsnew.msnw</a></p>
<p>Both people with alexithymia, or if you know someone who has it, or for people who are researching or &#8216;just curious&#8217; about it,  all welcome to join in the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-13278</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-13278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some interesting comments.  I agree that a-lexi-thymia (no words for feelings) may not be the most revealing way to term what we know as alexithymic behaviour .... as a poster above posed- would a mute individual also be considered alexithymic because they couldn&#039;t say their emotions? But of course the mute person could write down his or her feelings on paper, or think them, meaning that technically they certainly do have words for feelings! So whether one can or cannot &quot;verbalize&quot; is not actually a problem.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bigger conundrum lies in an alexithymic individual&#039;s demonstrable ability to occasionally use accurate words for feelings, ie. to get their words for emotions right (!)  such as when they cry and might intellectually be able to designate what they observe as &quot;sadness,&quot; i.e., there are sometimes words for feelings, although artificially applied. The bigger issue may be the alexithymic individual&#039;s inability to imagine, &quot;to picture&quot; one&#039;s emotions and the emotional situation one is in, which ability would make for a *personal* intuition and a subsequent personal experience of one&#039;s emotions rather than a purely noetic (purely intellectual) inference by way of dispassionate scientistic observation.  It is this emotional-picturing mechanism, or more accurately the lack thereof,  which lays at the core of alexithymia.  As described by the recognised alexithymia construct there is &quot;CONSTRICTED IMAGINAL PROCESSES&quot; involved, suggesting that maybe a Greek term along the lines: no-images-for-emotions may have been more appropriate for this syndrome? Not that it matters.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here is a little more about the alexithymic deficit in imagining: http://alexithymiadepot.blogspot.com/&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Buck&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting comments.  I agree that a-lexi-thymia (no words for feelings) may not be the most revealing way to term what we know as alexithymic behaviour &#8230;. as a poster above posed- would a mute individual also be considered alexithymic because they couldn&#8217;t say their emotions? But of course the mute person could write down his or her feelings on paper, or think them, meaning that technically they certainly do have words for feelings! So whether one can or cannot &#8220;verbalize&#8221; is not actually a problem.  </p>
<p>The bigger conundrum lies in an alexithymic individual&#8217;s demonstrable ability to occasionally use accurate words for feelings, ie. to get their words for emotions right (!)  such as when they cry and might intellectually be able to designate what they observe as &#8220;sadness,&#8221; i.e., there are sometimes words for feelings, although artificially applied. The bigger issue may be the alexithymic individual&#8217;s inability to imagine, &#8220;to picture&#8221; one&#8217;s emotions and the emotional situation one is in, which ability would make for a *personal* intuition and a subsequent personal experience of one&#8217;s emotions rather than a purely noetic (purely intellectual) inference by way of dispassionate scientistic observation.  It is this emotional-picturing mechanism, or more accurately the lack thereof,  which lays at the core of alexithymia.  As described by the recognised alexithymia construct there is &#8220;CONSTRICTED IMAGINAL PROCESSES&#8221; involved, suggesting that maybe a Greek term along the lines: no-images-for-emotions may have been more appropriate for this syndrome? Not that it matters.   </p>
<p>Here is a little more about the alexithymic deficit in imagining: <a href="http://alexithymiadepot.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://alexithymiadepot.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Buck</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ifeelya</title>
		<link>http://www.damninteresting.com/the-emotional-bankruptcy-of-alexithymia#comment-13152</link>
		<dc:creator>ifeelya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=80#comment-13152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why must everyone be connected at all times? Why must there be an attempt to drug anyone into submission who isn&#039;t presently suffering from group-think? I mean, past a certain point necessary for survival,  I can&#039;t think why anyone would want to be drugged out of experiencing their own life. Is a more contemplative life so entirely unacceptable? Certainly, there is a huge range of existence between the terminally-engaged and the terminally-disengaged. Wouldn&#039;t it seem like a fully functional person SHOULD be able to range back and forth across that whole spectrum? What if I wince when you show me your hangnail, but am completely detached from the gory corpse on rotten.com, and you are the opposite? Is somebody right and somebody wrong? Curiously enough, I wondered all this with a completely lack of emotion. I&#039;d engage emotionally and re-do, but can&#039;t locate enough emotion for the subject just at the moment. Please drug me now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why must everyone be connected at all times? Why must there be an attempt to drug anyone into submission who isn&#8217;t presently suffering from group-think? I mean, past a certain point necessary for survival,  I can&#8217;t think why anyone would want to be drugged out of experiencing their own life. Is a more contemplative life so entirely unacceptable? Certainly, there is a huge range of existence between the terminally-engaged and the terminally-disengaged. Wouldn&#8217;t it seem like a fully functional person SHOULD be able to range back and forth across that whole spectrum? What if I wince when you show me your hangnail, but am completely detached from the gory corpse on rotten.com, and you are the opposite? Is somebody right and somebody wrong? Curiously enough, I wondered all this with a completely lack of emotion. I&#8217;d engage emotionally and re-do, but can&#8217;t locate enough emotion for the subject just at the moment. Please drug me now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
