Not trying to get off subject here, but isn’t it awfully interesting how most subjects can end up in a religious debate or have some kind of connection to it? Maybe it’s just me.
Anyways, I do have a sense of humor and think this is hilarious as well.”[/quote]

You’re the only person to bring it up, so I don’t really see the conection.

Not trying to get off subject here, but isn’t it awfully interesting how most subjects can end up in a religious debate or have some kind of connection to it? Maybe it’s just me.
Anyways, I do have a sense of humor and think this is hilarious as well.

Mention of the plethysmograph reminded me of a study done.

Here is an interesting quote from the article I put a link to:

The Northwestern study strongly suggests this is true. The Northwestern researchers measured the psychological and physiological sexual arousal in homosexual and heterosexual men and women as they watched erotic films. There were three types of erotic films: those featuring only men, those featuring only women and those featuring male and female couples. As with previous research, the researchers found that men responded consistent with their sexual orientations. In contrast, both homosexual and heterosexual women showed a bisexual pattern of psychological as well as genital arousal. That is, heterosexual women were just as sexually aroused by watching female stimuli as by watching male stimuli, even though they prefer having sex with men rather than women.

I feel this might explain some of the sociological aspects of homophobia.

Rarely now, the now P.C. term according to my gay friends is simply “Queer” or “Gay” amongst friends and “homosexual or transgendered” in general conversation or media.
I always wondered how the word fruit came to mean gay anyway? Anyone have a history on this word in that conotation? Aparantly it is an older term than I would have thought. Humm.

HAHAHAHAHA

that’s just hilarious!
like the worst name they could’ve thought of!