Sorry to interrupt...this will only take a moment.
This site is an independent reader-supported project.
Because you have viewed at least a few articles now...
Can you give a small donation to keep us online?
We can give you e-books and audiobooks and stuff.
This site is an independent reader-supported project.
The cost of keeping it running are considerable.
If you can spare a few dollars it would help us enormously.
We can give you e-books and audiobooks and stuff.
×
×
Experimental Feature

Select 'Atmospheric Audio' from the Audio menu to add subtle background audio to certain portions of the article.

Better Call Sol

Article #341 • Written by Alan Bellows

▼ Scroll to Continue ▼

On 10 January 1709, pioneering weather observer William Derham recorded an historic event outside his home near London. He examined his thermometer in the frigid morning air and jotted an entry into his meticulous meteorological log. The prior weeks had been typical for an English winter, but overnight an oppressive cold had lodged itself over the Kingdom. As far as Derham was aware, London had never experienced so few millimeters of mercury as it did that morning: -12º C.

The remarkable cold lingered in Europe for weeks. Lakes, rivers, and the sea froze over, and the soil solidified a meter deep. The cold cracked open trees, crushed the life out of livestock huddling in stables, and made travel a treacherous undertaking. It was the coldest winter in the past 500 years, and one of the coldest moments in a larger global phenomenon known as the Little Ice Age. Likely causes include volcanic activity, oceanic currents, and/or reforestation due to Black-Death-induced population decline. It is nearly certain, however, that it has something to do with the unusually low number of sunspots that appeared at that time, a phenomenon referred to as the Maunder minimum.

We now know that such solar minima correlate quite closely with colder-than-normal temperatures on Earth, but science has yet to ascertain exactly why. Solar maximums, on the other hand, have historically had little noteworthy impact on the Earth apart from extra-splendid auroral displays. But thanks to our modern, electrified, interconnected society these previously innocuous events could cause catastrophic economic and social damage in the coming decades.

Astronomers first began to monitor sunspots in the early 1600s. Although no one knew the nature of the dark blemishes on the surface of the sun, the sort of people who keep painstaking records of things began to keep painstaking records of sunspots. Scientists have since learned that sunscabs arise when the sun's magnetic field lines twist and tangle due to layers of plasma inside the sun rotating at different rates. This tangling produces magnetic loops which can protrude from the photosphere and smother the underlying convection, thereby decreasing the amount of heat reaching the surface. Sunspots only appear dark in contrast to the extremely bright areas around them; viewed in isolation a sunspot would still be quite squint-worthy. Over time the field lines become more and more tangled, resulting in more protruding loops, until the magnetic disarray reaches a tipping point at about 11 years where the magnetic field snaps into a new orientation and the cycle starts anew.

Plasma traveling along magnetic loops protruding from the sun's photosphere.
Plasma traveling along magnetic loops protruding from the sun's photosphere.

Occasionally these magnetic loops become so twisted that positive and negative sections are forced together, causing an explosive solar flare. The most potent of these coronal explosions can fling billions of tons of plasma out into space at about a million miles per hour in a coronal mass ejection (CME). During a solar minimum these events occur about once per week, and during a maximum they can occur several times per day. The vast majority of CMEs belch off into unoccupied space, but occasionally we Earthlings happen to be in their path. Solar flares are classified A, B, C, M, or X based on the amount of electromagnetic energy they carry. C-class and smaller flares are too weak to cause any kerfuffle for humanity, M-class can cause minor inconvenience for astronauts and radio enthusiasts, and X-class are capable of serious geomagnetic agitation.

A CME plasma wave is magnetically charged, with positive and negative poles inherited from the magnetic loop that spawned it. Consequently, when such a wave impacts the Earth's magnetic field the nature of the interaction depends upon the relative orientation of the two magnetic fields. The way that f*cking magnets work is that opposite poles attract and like poles repel; so if a powerful wave hits the Earth's magnetic field aligned mostly positive-to-positive, the plasma will be repelled. If it hits positive-to-negative essentially all of the plasma will pour into the atmosphere via the north and south poles, causing a geomagnetic storm.

In late summer 1859, the sun was in a particularly persnickety solar maximum, and a complex cluster of tightly packed sunspots was drawing a lot of attention from astronomers. On 28 August the night sky was alight with brilliant auroras much further from the poles than usual. Operators of the fledgling telegraph system reported some unusual technical glitches the same evening. There were widespread outages, electrical arcs from telegraph receivers, and a few small fires at telegraph stations. Unbeknownst to the telegraphers and astronomers these effects were due to a CME causing extreme magnetic variation in the atmosphere. Faraday's law of induction observes that a magnetic field changing with time will induce a voltage changing with time, and some telegraph wires were long enough to be exposed to a quite a range of magnetic variation. Consequently a high-voltage induced current was created up and down the wires.

Please do not pick at sunscabs.
Please do not pick at sunscabs.

Two days later, the British astronomer Richard Carrington was observing the interesting sunspot group through his telescope when he saw what he described as "two patches of intensely bright and white light" over the sunspots. He jotted a note in his painstaking record. That night there was scarcely a square inch of earth that was not illuminated by aurora. As far south as the Rocky Mountains the sky became so bright that birds began chirping and campers awoke and began cooking breakfast. Blood-red auroral light hovered over Cuba and Hawaii. The already-rattled telegraph operators at the American Telegraph Company found their equipment sputtering high-voltage nonsense messages most of the next morning, and some offices reported injuries and property damage due to electrocutions and fire.

This second coronal mass ejection, now known as the Carrington Super Flare, had sent the energy equivalent of a few billion atomic bombs towards the Earth. Moreover, the flare from two days prior had swept aside most of the ambient solar wind plasma, allowing the X-class Carrington flare to arrive with much greater speed and energy than usual. It reached the Earth in a mere 17 hours rather than the typical 3-4 days, and it triggered the most spectacular geomagnetic storm in recorded history.

Since 1859 the quaint cabling of the Victorian electrical and telegraph networks have multiplied into millions of miles of power and telecommunication conductors worldwide, all interconnected via fragile electrical transformers. These days power line voltages are much higher to improve transmission efficiency, which has the side effect of making the lines more sensitive to induced currents. Moreover, many high-voltage transformers are directly connected to the ground to offset lightning strikes and other power surges, but this also provides a back door for strong geomagnetic currents.

If the sun were to fling another such super flare towards the Earth today, solar observatories operated by the US Air Force and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would detect the telltale X-ray burst of a solar flare just minutes after the eruption, but with insufficient data to assess whether it would be a threat. Space-based instrumentation between the Earth and Sol would record and relay information regarding the trajectory, intensity, and orientation of the plasma wave, but not until the CME was well on its way. An official assessment of the incoming CME risk would become available just a few hours before impact.

Artist's rendition of a CME interacting with the Earth's magnetic field (NASA).
Artist's rendition of a CME interacting with the Earth's magnetic field (NASA).

If the wave were to strike the Earth’s magnetic field aligned positive-to-negative the resulting geomagnetic storm would render most electrical, telephone, and Internet landlines temporarily inoperable due to induced currents, with intensity proportional to proximity to the poles. Widespread radio, cellphone, and GPS disruption would occur. Oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the upper atmosphere would absorb electrons and emit photons resulting in flashy planet-wide aurora. This influx of energy would cause the upper atmosphere to warm and expand, increasing drag on low-orbiting satellites, knocking some off course and others out of the sky entirely. X-rays from plasma interactions with the atmosphere would also damage some satellites’ electronics. A troubling amount of the ozone layer would be dismantled by reactions with ionized gas, increasing UV radiation on the ground.

Many electrical transformers--particularly the high-voltage variety--would be destroyed due to overheating, resulting in large-scale grid failures within a few seconds. Some sections of power lines could heat sufficiently to melt the wire. Apart from damage caused by power surges, small electronic devices would not be harmed by such a slow, large-scale magnetic event; however they would become essentially useless if there is no electrical grid to recharge their batteries and no communications grid to tickle their antennae. Automobiles and airplanes would likewise be spared, but fuel may become difficult to obtain.

In the aftermath of a sufficiently intense storm, sizable populations could be left without electricity for an extended period of time. For example, a flare about 15% as energetic as Carrington struck in 1989 and left the Canadian province of Quebec without power for nine hours due to severe transformer damage. The most vulnerable Extra High Voltage (EHV) transformers are costly and time-consuming to custom-build, and in this hypothetical geomagnetic apocalypse the factories that construct them could also be without power, exacerbating the outages into months or years. During the widespread blackouts it may become difficult or impossible to obtain clean water, food, fuel, medicine, and emergency services in many areas. A 2008 National Academy of Sciences report estimated that a Carrington-level event would could cause "extensive social and economic disruptions" in the United States, requiring $1-2 trillion and 10 years to fully recover. This is not taking into account the economic losses from lack of transportation, electrification, communication, and refrigeration, nor the attendant health costs. The ozone layer would take about four years to recover to current levels.

Sorry NdT.
Sorry NdT.

Most solar scientists today agree that a Carrington-level super flare is improbable anytime in the near future. By measuring deposits of beryllium-10 in ice core samples researchers have found that Carrington-level flares strike the Earth once every 500 years or so on average, so the next one is probably not due for another few centuries--"probably" being the operative adverb. In the meantime organizations such as NOAA are attempting to persuade governments to plan for these low-frequency/high-consequence events. Among other measures, this could include the installation of resistor arrays to protect critical transformers, or an action plan to deploy workers to physically disconnect sections of the power grid on very short notice. Either measure would be effective but expensive. Equally concerning is the fact that some of the critical space-based monitoring instruments are approaching their life expectancy, with no obvious replacement at the ready, jeopardizing our ability to assess incoming CME threats.

As for solar minima such as the Maunder Minimum that caused the Great Frost of 1709, although the correlation between low sunspot activity and low temperatures is strong, the reason for this is poorly understood. Scientists note that lulls in sunspot activity correspond to an uptick in cosmic rays on Earth, which may in turn increase the proportion of reflective clouds and therefore reduce the solar energy absorbed by the atmosphere. Recent observations have also suggested that the sun's UV output may be related to its progress in its solar cycle, which could affect the Earth's weather in as-yet-unexplained ways. Minima aren't necessarily altogether negative phenomena; some scientists cheerfully point out that future severe minima may help to offset global warming for brief periods. Additionally, researchers have hypothesized that the "perfect sound" of Stradivarius's violins may have been due to a higher-density wood that grew during the Maunder Minimum. Still other researchers hypothesize that those researchers are just being silly, pointing to double-blind experiments demonstrating that modern musicians cannot hear a significant difference between a Stradivarius violin and an inexpensive modern one. Debate continues.

In any case, another Maunder-level minimum is inevitable eventually, as is a future encounter with a Carrington-level super flare. Both are normal, healthy functions of a giant, 4.57-billion-year-old, naturally-occurring nuclear fusion furnace that is indifferent to the skim of life that has developed on a puny sphere of rock 93 million miles away. Let us just hope that humanity is ready when the sun sneezes a billion or so tons of charged plasma at our planet sometime in the next 350 orbits. Perhaps we'll luck out and the Yellowstone supervolcano will erupt first, smothering half the planet in warm ash and saving at least some of us from experiencing the horror of an Internetless Earth.

Article written by Alan Bellows, published on 07 August 2012. Alan is the founder/designer/head writer/managing editor of Damn Interesting.

Special thanks to James Tyrwhitt-Drake for the cover video.

For more science, history, and psychology, follow us:
SHARE

More Information
Related Articles


27 Comments
nonsequitur
Posted 08 August 2012 at 08:27 am

Seriously DI, Alan. But "F-ing" magnets? Really? This is a family show.


TomS937
Posted 08 August 2012 at 09:41 am

Yeah. I was a bit surprised to see that word there too. I'm not offended when it fits, but it seemed out of place there. It didn't really add anything. But overall it was truly DI and I really enjoyed hearing how much of what we depend upon could be seriously affected by something we would only noticed in the night sky. Thanks.


ZapBeeb
Posted 08 August 2012 at 09:48 am

Surprised but F-ing interesting.
Nothing like a possible planetwide catastrophe to enjoy a summer evening :D


BKunkle
Posted 08 August 2012 at 09:57 am

The F-word in this context is offensive and very much out of the norm for the excellent style of writing we usually find here. I was wondering if the site had possibly been hacked.

Anyway, it is an otherwise excellent article.


nonsequitur
Posted 08 August 2012 at 09:58 am

And yes, I get the Insane Clown Posse reference. Quite a cunning lyrical tie in. I just think maybe Death Magnetic might be more apropos, not to mention kid friendly...


Alan Bellows
Posted 08 August 2012 at 10:04 am

I had originally taken the stance that a good joke is more important than aversion to particular groupings of syllables. Then someone on Facebook advised me to think of the children who use DI as a source for school reports and such, so I've revised that paragraph slightly to reduce the shockiness.

Free speech takes another blow.


nonsequitur
Posted 08 August 2012 at 10:11 am

Alan Bellows said: "I had originally taken the stance that a good joke is more important than aversion to particular groupings of syllables. Then someone on Facebook advised me to think of the children who use DI as a source for school reports and such, so I’ve revised that paragraph slightly to reduce the shockiness.

Free speech takes another blow."

Alan Bellows said: "I had originally taken the stance that a good joke is more important than aversion to particular groupings of syllables. Then someone on Facebook advised me to think of the children who use DI as a source for school reports and such, so I’ve revised that paragraph slightly to reduce the shockiness.

Free speech takes another blow."

Not "Free Speech", just Eloquent Expression!


starsaillor
Posted 08 August 2012 at 01:33 pm

Great article


darren.l
Posted 08 August 2012 at 03:19 pm

Thank you Alan and DI for more tasty brain food. More please :)

I liked the dark humour of the F word (Remind me again how f* magnets work?) and of the last paragraph.

Thank you kind Sir(s)

D


Reaper
Posted 08 August 2012 at 06:44 pm

Guys, the lewd comment (f*cking magnet) is referring to a word replacement -- i.e., the sentence originally read how to make whoopie. ("opposite poles attracting?" Giggidy!) He then "replaced" the lewd word with magnet.

Personally, it didn't bother me at all. If any kid actually uses "damninteresting" as a reference (and the teacher allows it), then I don't think a bad word here and there will change anything. And if it does, fine -- just use the article's non-Wikipedia references like the smart kids do :P

On topic, I don't care if I have to go 10 years without internet -- I want to see the full-on Aurora without going way up north (and not the "red blur on the horizon" aurora -- I want to see the "plasma curtains waving in the sky" aurora!)

I particularly like the macabre humor about hoping Yellowstone wipes out a large swath of humanity so they don't have to endure an internetless existence.


samwise
Posted 08 August 2012 at 11:46 pm

no one here watches breaking bad? :O
but its such a great show!


Jeremy M
Posted 09 August 2012 at 10:56 am

First post, BIG fan!
This article makes me want to become one of those prepper nut cases. I'm curious to know if the 500 year average comes along in a pretty routine pattern around 500 +/- 50 years kind of thing or if there have been time gaps of 100 years and 1000 years working toward the average.


piquantement
Posted 09 August 2012 at 11:08 am

Everyone complaining about the "f*cking" must not know the internet very well.
Guys, it's a reference to a ridiculous song lyric, he didn't just stick that in there just because, and it is not a reference to sex. Okay.

Great to see another article, really loved reading this one!


Cdrjameson
Posted 10 August 2012 at 06:15 am

Just a point - 'millimetres of mercury' are used to measure atmospheric pressure, not temperature (unless this is what you meant).

Also, the sweary is completely out of keeping with the usual tone, joke or not, and may seem somewhat baffling in a few years time (or in the next book!)


wxnerd
Posted 10 August 2012 at 01:52 pm

I don't think he was referring to the unit of measurement. Some thermometers (and probably just about all during the time referenced) had mercury in them, which would expand as the temperature increases. So the lower the temperature, the less the volume of the mercury, so the length of the mercury in the tube would be smaller for cooler temperatures than warmer ones. The difference can be measured in millimeters.


displacedCanadian
Posted 11 August 2012 at 01:22 am

Goddamn this is a great read!

Anyway, having spent the better part of 8 years trying to figure out the carbon cycle as it relates to climate (past and present), I am struck by how little attention is actually paid to the sun by climate scientists (self included). Yes, there are many forces on Earth that can alter climate, but many indications show the sun can pretty much beat them all. And events like Carrington or the minima have proven to have very immediate pronounced and profound effects on what happens here.

I hope to see more satellites and telescopes cast their gaze on Sol in the near future, as well as more work on figuring out how we can estimate past solar activity in conjunction with the ancient climate indicators. Might go a long way towards helping us predict future clusterf*cks.


sssssssspoon
Posted 12 August 2012 at 11:39 am

Well done! Very squint-worthy.


Nathan_SA
Posted 13 August 2012 at 07:12 am

Thanks Alan! Great read! Cheers


casaba
Posted 14 August 2012 at 03:36 am

Thanks. History, science, and humor--and a doomsday prophesy on top. Cannot ask for more.


Hantas
Posted 14 August 2012 at 01:36 pm

@ Cdrjameson
"Just a point – ‘millimetres of mercury’ are used to measure atmospheric pressure, not temperature (unless this is what you meant)."

I think 'millimetres of mercury' is a great description for temperature:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hVVw6rZDBn4/ToFRnKN2sxI/AAAAAAAAATU/1ZfrvzQeUEQ/s200/thermometer.jpg


Adam Martin
Posted 26 August 2012 at 01:40 pm

The "effing magnets" thing was a reference to a "song" by the "musical" group Insane Clown Posse - an exceptionally stupid song, even by the exceptionally stupid standards of the ICP.

Another fine article, Mr. Bellows, and we're all glad to see DI once again alive and on the air. And if another Carrington event does befall us, we will truly be..............SOL.


Yippeeyappee
Posted 29 August 2012 at 06:20 pm

Free speech takes another blow."

I really love the writing here, Alan, and the comment didn't bother me at all, though I was puzzled, not being familiar with the reference.

However, free speech is blow-free here. No one is trying to suppress your right to express yourself in any way you want to on your site. You are perfectly free to restore the original text if you wish, without threat of government sanction. Losing a few readers who are uncomfortable with such language is a possible consequence of that action, so you have made your own choice to replace the offending words with a substitute wording that fools no one.

Free speech means that you can say what you want, but if someone disagrees with you, then they, too, are free to express their contrary opinion. It doesn't mean that people should never suffer a consequence for what they say. Just ask Todd Akin. He believes it. He said it. No believer in free speech would tell him he CAN'T say it. But he shouldn't have said it.


Alan Bellows
Posted 30 August 2012 at 08:24 am

Yippeeyappee said: "However, free speech is blow-free here. No one is trying to suppress your right to express yourself in any way you want to on your site. You are perfectly free to restore the original text if you wish, without threat of government sanction."

I was merely employing dry hyperbole as a means of conveying my disappointment. I am aware that no government used force to silence my profanity...this time.


teatime musings
Posted 05 September 2012 at 12:35 am

Internetless Earth ! Oh Horror !!!

Excellent article, as always Feel like getting a telescope and a long register and what-have-you and start tracking.......


FredPret
Posted 11 October 2012 at 11:18 am

Stradivarius! With a d!

Really glad to see the blog is up and running again today!


eli
Posted 02 February 2014 at 04:04 pm

nonsequitur said: "And yes, I get the Insane Clown Posse reference. Quite a cunning lyrical tie in. I just think maybe Death Magnetic might be more apropos, not to mention kid friendly..."

I was wondering who on here would recognize it... I thought it was funny


Jrunner2112
Posted 01 April 2014 at 12:20 pm

Damn Interesting as is with all the stories. This article among others finally got me off my F* magnet to register and contribute. Welcome back and keep up the great work.


END OF COMMENTS
Add Your Comment

Note: Your email address will not be published, shared, spammed, or otherwise mishandled. Anonymous comments are more likely to be held for moderation. You can optionally register or login.

You may use basic formatting HTML such as <i>, <b>, and <blockquote>.